On the opening weekend of
The
58th New York Film Festival, I streamed the new
Amazon documentary, “All
In: The Fight for Democracy”, featuring Stacey Abrams.
Synopsis
Stacey Abrams chronicles
her campaign for Georgia Governor and illustrates how her loss follows a
pattern of voter suppression.
Story
In 2018, Democrat Stacey
Abrams declared her candidacy for Governor of the state of Georgia. Previously, she had served in the state’s
House Of Representatives, eventually becoming the House minority leader. Her opponent was Republican Brian Kemp, the Georgia Secretary Of State, who was in charge of all elections that took place throughout
the state. As it became clear through the campaign that Abrams was earning a huge following, it is
believed Kemp grew so concerned he might lose that he may have used
his influence to interfere with the election.
Manipulation of elections
and preventing prospective voters from casting a ballot is nothing new in
elections – especially in the United States.
Once slavery ended, southern states looked for ways to keep African
Americans from voting; one way was via a poll tax in order to discourage the Black vote. Since may of them lived in poverty, they
would be forced to make a choice: either
pay money to vote or use that money to buy food. It was not until the 1960's that President Johnson -- with the help of Rev. Martin Luther King, Jr. -- that the Voting
Rights Act was made law.
Years later, this bigotry
remained intact but more insidious. Nothing
set this off more than the election of Barack Obama as President of the United
States. Seeing how the demographics of the
nation was changing, local governments gerrymandered their congressional
districts in such a way that Democrats – and especially minorities – would be
under-represented. This was exacerbated when
the Supreme Court effectively blew up the Voting Rights Act, which allowed many
states – including a number of northern states – to conduct similar
re-districting.
Review
Watching “All In: The Fight For Democracy” is infuriating,
disquieting and depressing. It’s
infuriating because it makes painfully clear Abrams had the election stolen
from her. Disquieting because the voter
suppression prevalent during the Jim Crow era was not only alive
and well but also expanding in its geography and sophistication. It’s ultimately depressing because on
the weekend of Ruth Bader Ginsberg’s death, it reminds us how the Supreme Court
gutted the Voting Rights Act, setting the stage for the gerrymandering in the United States.
Ultimately, you feel pride and immense inspiration to vote. It’s hard to watch
this documentary dispassionately; as an American, it stirs up so many
emotions simultaneously – and that’s part of what makes “All In” so effective. What’s alarming is how ill
prepared our nation is if there’s a large voter turnout; we see both Abrams and Kemp (who eventually went on to win) encounter difficulties
when trying to vote. Many Georgia
residents had to wait in line for hours to vote because of a combination of
high volume and defective voting machines.
As to the documentary itself, it is well structured; it lays out a clear story and tells it in a compelling fashion, resulting in a resolution. The filmmakers did an outstanding job of telling multiple tales concurrently: that of Abrams herself intertwined with racism, sexism and an explanation of how elections are stolen – in ways both obvious and subtle. Both stories are so layered and complex, it is a tribute to the movie’s directors, Liz Garbus and Lisa Cortés. By the end of the film, if you don’t feel moved to vote, then what will it take?
No comments:
Post a Comment
Speak Your Piece, Beeyotch!