Sunday, May 17, 2015

“Two Shots Fired”– Movie Review

 

2shots

This week, I attended a screening at The Film Society Of Lincoln Center of the new comedy-drama from Argentina “Two Shots Fired” (or “Two Gunshots”, depending on the translation). 

Synopsis

When a young man survives a suicide attempt, will his relationship with his family also be able to survive?

Story

One day while trying to repair the family lawnmower, Mariano (Rafael Federman) finds a pistol in the backyard’s toolshed.   Fascinated with the weapon, he brings it back to his room and fires it – once at his head and once at his stomach.  As it happens, the first shot just grazed his skull and he managed to recover from the shot to his stomach; after spending only a week in the hospital, he returns home where his mother Susana (Susana Pampin) and older brother Ezequiel (Benjamín Coehlo) take care of him while he recuperates. 

While it remains unclear as to why Mariano did it – much less how he managed to live through it – his family seems not to want to press the issue with him and instead prefer to just let him try to return to his life as normal, which includes playing a recorder as part of a quartet.  Meanwhile, Mariano’s family makes an effort to return to their own life as well; in the case of Ezequiel, it means driving around the neighborhood looking for the family dog, which recently ran away.  For Susana, it means a great many things, not the least of which being keeping an eye on Mariano. 

After taking some sleeping pills, Susana sleeps for three straight days; once she wakes up, she decides to take a vacation with a few acquaintances.  Staying at a small house by the beach, Susana soon finds that she’s with a group of people she simply can’t stand.  Nevertheless, the group at least make an effort to get along as best they can during their stay.  But upon returning home, will Susana find everything back to normal or will there be yet another unpleasant surprise from Mariano awaiting her?   

Review

There are some novels which, while you read them, you might wonder to yourself, “Gee, I can’t see how they could ever make a movie out of this thing!”.  One example might be “Catch-22”; while the book by Joseph Heller was very successful, the film on which it was based was not.  “Two Shots Fired” is not based on a novel; it is instead an original screenplay by longtime filmmaker Martín Rejtman.  If anyone who ever read this screenplay gave an honest appraisal to Rejtman (which apparently never happened), they likely would have similarly told him you can’t make a movie out of that thing. 

It certainly doesn’t help when the person charged with making the film doesn’t understand its genre or when both the characters and the story line are so horribly disjointed (see below for a more detailed explanation on this).  When the filmmaker feels no obligation to commit to telling a story with interesting characters, it’s hard for viewers to make the necessary emotional investment necessary to maintain an interest in the story. If the screenplay had been written by Pirandello, it likely would’ve been titled, “A Bunch Of Oddball Characters In Search Of A Plot”. 

Following the screening, there was a question-and-answer session with the writer-director of “Two Shots Fired”, Martín Rejtman.  Rejtman said that he seems genuinely surprised that a number of people see his movie as a comedy because he sees it as something more in the genre of a thriller.  He was asked about the characters’ lacking of interaction with each other; Rejtman claimed that he doesn’t really see the world that way, but rather, that is how he sees the world of those characters and no deeper meaning was intended beyond that. 

Two Shots Fired (2014) on IMDb

Tuesday, May 12, 2015

“I’ll See You In My Dreams”– Movie Review

 

CU_Dreams

This week, I attended a New York Times Film Club screening of the new comedy-drama, “I’ll See You In My Dreams”, starring Blythe Danner and Sam Elliott. 

Synopsis

When a woman’s world is turned upside down after suffering personal losses, will an unexpected romance convince her there is another chapter in her life?

Story

Recently forced to put her beloved dog to sleep, Carol (Danner) suddenly finds herself more alone now than ever before.  Between spending the past 20 years as a widow and her daughter Katherine (Malin Akerman) living out of town, Carol is understandably feeling there’s nothing left for her in life.  As a result, Carol’s days are filled with either sipping Chardonnay or playing bridge with her gal pals (Rhea Perlman, June Squibb and Mary Kay Place).  So, it comes as something of a shock that Lloyd (Martin Starr), her new pool cleaner, takes a sudden interest in her. 

Despite a vast age difference, Carol and Lloyd bond over their mutual love of music.  Soon, the two forge a friendship that has all the appearances of possibly blossoming into a romance.  Although having affection for Lloyd, Carol hesitates to take it to the next level precisely because of the fact that she’s nearly twice his age might; the thought of being labeled a “cougar” doesn’t exactly appeal to her.  It is around this time that Bill (Elliott) runs into her at a pharmacy and proceeds to hit on her; after a few chance meetings at various spots around town, Carol agrees to go out on a date with him.

It takes only a few dates, but it is soon clear to both of them that they are hitting it off; excited at the prospect of a new romance so late in life, they agree to see each other with increasing frequency.  The problem with their plan is Lloyd; when he learns Carol is seeing Bill on a somewhat regular basis, he’s quite disappointed – perhaps even a little heartbroken because Lloyd sincerely believed he had a chance with Carol.  With Lloyd lurking in the background, will Carol be able to continue exploring a relationship with Bill or will Lloyd try to break them up? 

Review

“I’ll See You In My Dreams” tries to build on the relatively recent success of movies like “The Best Exotic Marigold Hotel” by appealing to the geriatric set with late-in-life romantic adventures.  Unfortunately, it ultimately gets derailed by its own cloying cuteness and plot contrivances.  As an example, there’s a scene where Carol and her bridge buddies get high on medical marijuana!  Really?  In an effort to extend the joke – already built on a rather flimsy premise – they get stopped by a policeman when he spots them pushing a shopping cart full of munchies back to Carol’s place. 

The ability to suspend your disbelief beyond any reasonable degree combined with immunity to an utterly relentless succession of clichés are what an audience will need in order to get through a viewing of “I’ll See You In My Dreams”.  The movie isn’t about aging so much as dealing with life’s various challenges, no matter what your age; this is certainly a noble theme to plumb, but the film’s material turns out to be less than capable of the task.  As a comedy, it’s mildly amusing at best, often relying on old tricks to get laughs; as a drama, it also depends heavily on trite plotting. 

Following the screening, there was a question-and-answer session with the movie’s director and co-writer, Brett Haley, as well as some of its stars – Blythe Danner, Sam Elliott and Rhea Perlman.  Haley said that this screenplay was rejected by just about everyone in Hollywood, but that didn’t stop him from trying to get the film made; in the end, it was produced as an independent with a small budget (partly through Kickstarter funding) and wound up having only an 18 day shooting schedule.  Danner said she loved the script but expected only to be offered a role as one of the bridge-playing cohorts; she was delighted when she was asked to play the role of Carol, but knew it would be demanding because the character is in nearly every scene. 

I'll See You in My Dreams (2015) on IMDb

Tuesday, May 05, 2015

“Saint Laurent”– Movie Review

 

SL

This week, I attended a New York Times Film Club screening of “Saint Laurent”, a drama starring Gaspard Ulliel in the title role as noted fashion designer Yves Saint Laurent. 

Synopsis

As Yves Saint Laurent’s success in the fashion world increases, his personal life spins out of control – but will his dangerous lifestyle choices threaten his career or his life?

Story

From the mid-1960’s to the mid-1970’s, couturier Yves Saint Laurent (Ulliel) commanded the attention of the fashion industry with his bold, feminine designs that not only made women feel beautiful, but also more glamorous and confident as well.  Despite achieving a level of success beyond his wildest dreams, Saint Laurent was still feeling empty; his dedication to work resulted in him having precious little in the way of a personal life.  As a result, in those all-too-rare moments when he found himself able to break away from his office, Saint Laurent wound up going way overboard when it came to partying.

Although having both a personal and professional relationship with his companion Pierre (Jérémie Renier), Saint Laurent’s lust was insatiable; he frequently found himself prowling the streets at night in search of male prostitutes.  Eventually, he landed a more meaningful relationship with Jacques (Louis Garrel), a striking model who dragged the designer into increasingly dark areas of his life – places which Saint Laurent apparently went rather willingly, despite protests from Pierre and investors in their company who grew concerned about the fashionista’s well-being. 

In Saint Laurent’s later years, he was very much a loner, largely having been abandoned by his friends and former colleagues.  Living in an ornate home with only his pet dog to keep him company, Saint Laurent became a chain-smoker only able to hold a conversation with his domestics.  He spent much of his days and nights watching old movies on television and frequently reminiscing about his glory days; by this time, he has long since alienated Pierre, who remained connected to the business, but missed Jacques, who may have been his one true love.  With little left to keep him engaged post-retirement, Saint Laurent was eventually rescued by a long-overdue death. 

Review

While watching “Saint Laurent”, one can’t help but wondering that if the movie were to return to the editing room to have its scenes haphazardly rearranged in any random order, would anyone notice the difference?  Sadly, it appears unlikely – although another edit of the film is greatly in order; at two and a half hours in length, it is far too long, especially considering that the motion picture doesn’t have much in the way of a plot.  From a standpoint of dramatic narrative, it is just about as flat as a line in the electrocardiogram of an expired hospital patient – appropriate, since the motion picture is essentially DOA.  There is very little that draws viewers into the man’s story, aside from the fact that he’s famous and successful (which turns out to be not quite enough to maintain interest). 

Since there’s very little of a strong narrative thread in “Saint Laurent”, there’s no feeling of forward momentum to the story.  This results in a disastrous third act, which is where the wheels completely come off the movie (although they were never that securely fastened in the first place).  In this last portion of the film, Saint Laurent is seen largely as an elderly man whose moments of partial lucidity are occasionally interrupted by flashbacks that seem almost like non-sequiturs (but arguably, the scenes of Saint Laurent as an old man could be considered non-sequiturs as well). 

During this screening, there appeared to be quite a few people who bailed out – and who could blame them?  A long movie with little story about a dangerously hedonistic lunatic who appears to have little regard for those around him, Saint Laurent the character is hardly hero material.  At the end of the film, two women exiting the theater were heard discussing “Saint Laurent”; one said, “I thought the movie was ending 15 minutes ago”.  “It should have”, responded her friend.  In fact, it probably should’ve wrapped up a good deal sooner than that. 

Saint Laurent (2014) on IMDb

Wednesday, April 29, 2015

“Far From The Madding Crowd”– Movie Review

 

Madding_Crowd

This week, I attended a New York Times Film Club screening of the new drama, “Far From The Madding Crowd”, starring Carey Mulligan. 

Synopsis

When an independent young woman is pursued by three men, will she eventually wind up picking one of them or will she remain adamant and stay single?

Story

Bathsheba (Mulligan) is a beautiful young single woman trying to make her way in life as a farmer in 1870 England.  She manages to catch the eye of Gabriel Oak (Matthias Schoenaerts), a neighboring farmer, who soon proposes to her; Bathsheba declines, noting that she is in no need of a husband as that would shackle her.  Following some misfortune, Oak loses his farm to the bank and must leave; around this time, Bathsheba inherits an expansive family farm when her uncle passes away.  Coincidentally, Oak suddenly appears looking for work and accepts a job working for Bathsheba on the farm.

Nearby is William Boldwood (Michael Sheen), an older man who has experienced great success as both a farmer and businessman, tempered by unlucky romantic aspirations.  In visits, he appears to show modest interest if not curiosity about Bathsheba, a rare young single woman trying to make a go of farming on her own.  During a playful moment, she sends a missive to Boldwood which suggests she has romantic intentions.  Confronting her about this, he proposes, but is greatly embarrassed when rebuffed; trying to remain hopeful, Bathsheba agrees to at least think about Boldwood’s offer. 

Sergeant Francis Troy (Tom Sturridge) happens to meet Bathsheba during this period; a dashing young soldier, he mistakenly believes he was jilted at the altar by Fanny (Juno Temple) – as a result, he shows a definite interest in a now-flattered Bathsheba.  Impressed by Troy’s reputation of a great education which portends a successful future, she accepts his proposal of marriage, much to the dismay of both Oak and Boldwood.  When Troy suddenly turns up missing, Bathsheba’s farm is in danger due to his excessive gambling debts.  Believing Troy dead, Bathsheba now agrees to finally marry Boldwood – but when Oak decides he’s going to journey to America, will she let him go or can she convince him to stay by professing her love?

Review

If a romantic soap opera like period piece is what you want, “Far From The Madding Crowd” might just be right up your alley.  While there have been a good number of successful movies about strong independent women released in the last few years, this remake of “Far From The Madding Crowd” may not be among the best of them.  Another take on the Thomas Hardy novel, where this one goes awry may be partly due to the performance of Carey Mulligan as Bathsheba.  The portrayal comes across as rather smug and decidedly surly; although Bathsheba is a single woman trying to be a farmer in the 19th century, she doesn’t come across as being terribly sympathetic. 

The story constantly appears in search of a hero or heroine for whom to root.  Schoenaerts’ Oak is perhaps the most sympathetic character, but it’s not his story, it’s Bathsheba’s; Sheen’s Boldwood is arguably less sympathetic because he comes across as a somewhat weaker person – but again, it’s not about him.  So it appears as though the question becomes whether or not Bathsheba is heroic simply because her character is an underdog, regardless of her behavior and treatment of others.  While some might argue that because of her position she needed to create a tough exterior, it doesn’t excuse certain other behavior – for example, intentionally misleading Boldwood to believe she had romantic interests in him. 

In adapting the Hardy novel, the movie fails to make Bathsheba heroic, although she is clearly the protagonist.  For one thing, the manner in which she turns away potential suitors does little to allow the audience to see a sensitive, feeling human being exists there.  Also, the one true villain in the film turns out to be Troy and she does not defeat him through her own means; instead, he is dealt with improbably by Boldwood in an almost deus ex machina manner.   Ultimately, this reboot of “Far From The Madding Crowd” is rather unsatisfying, although lovers of bodice-ripper type yarns might disagree.

 

Far from the Madding Crowd (2015) on IMDb

Sunday, April 26, 2015

“Maggie”– Movie Review

 

maggie

On the closing weekend of The Tribeca Film Festival, I caught a screening of the World Premiere of “Maggie”, starring Arnold Schwarzenegger, Abigail Breslin and Joely Richardson. 

Synopsis

When a zombie plague takes hold of a small town, can a father save his daughter when she becomes infected?

Story

Sections of the Midwest are finding themselves as breeding grounds for zombies; this area of the United States is particularly hard hit because much of it is covered with farms and the zombie plague is being spread through much of the food that’s being grown there.  As a result, the government has required controlled burns of many farmers’ crops, causing them to see much of their livelihood literally go up in smoke.   But the problem doesn’t stop there.  People are also getting infected by the zombies – in particular, it seems to be the young people who are being targeted. 

Maggie (Breslin) is one such teenager.  In the small farming community where she and her family live, she’s seeing some of her high school friends similarly impacted.  Being recently hospitalized for infection herself, her father, Wade (Scharzenegger) isn’t about to let her rot away there; against medical advice, he signs her out and takes Maggie home to be with his wife Caroline (Richardson) and Maggie’s two step-siblings.  In doing so, however, Wade is fully aware that he’s taking an enormous risk – not only is he risking his own safety, but also that of Caroline and her children.  

Because of his decision, Wade winds up facing considerable resistance from the rest of the community.  A physician who happens to be a friend of Wade pulls him aside and gives him the straight story – he has three options, none of which are terribly desirable.  The first is to let Maggie return to the hospital, where she’ll get impersonal treatment; the second is to let her stay at home, but Wade will have to administer to her the same injections she would get in the hospital – and given how violently ill the shot would make his daughter, it would be hard for him as a parent to have to see.  The third option is arguably the hardest:  Wade would have to take immediate action to end Maggie’s suffering.  But can he kill his offspring?  Presented with this Hobson’s Choice, will Wade do what is best for the greater good or will he take the more selfish route? 

Review

It was the same old Arnold and it was a new “old” Arnold all at once.  While that statement may on its surface sound contradictory, once you see “Maggie”, it will all make sense.  On the one hand, fans of Arnold – that is to say, those who enjoyed many of the movies on which he built his successful career in Hollywood – will find much that is familiar in “Maggie”; in it, he plays the tough, rifle-toting bad-ass good-guy who will do whatever it takes to defend his family.  On the other hand, he does not make up the whole film; the story fundamentally focuses on the daughter Maggie and begs questions about whether teenagers are mature enough to make decisions based on moral or ethical situations. 

In “Maggie”, Arnold is not only allowing his muscle-bound ego to be considerably sublimated, he is also making a stab at a more dramatic, low-key character than what he has typically chosen to present to us.  The fact that the movie is ultimately more about his character’s daughter than his own character is rather telling; the fact that he’s now willing to take a backseat in addition to portraying himself as more human than cartoon character either suggests he is acknowledging his own aging or that he’s maturing creatively, much in the same way that Clint Eastwood has done in his own later years.

“Maggie” was directed by Henry Hobson, which was his first feature film.  In the context of this genre, Hobson has certainly done an extremely creditable job.  The look of “Maggie” is quite grim – scenes at the hospital are an institutional gray and the daytime skies are constantly cloudy and overcast with hardly any hint of sunshine ever.  For this movie, it works and was a perfect choice.  Also, Hobson never lets any of the performances go over the top; every one is subtle without allowing the film to be somnolent.  If you never thought you’d see an Arnold Schwarzenegger picture with nuanced characters, “Maggie” might surprise. 

 

Maggie (2015) on IMDb

Thursday, April 23, 2015

“Little Boy”– Movie Review

 

lilboy

This week, I attended a New York Times Film Club screening of the new drama “Little Boy”, with Emily Watson, Kevin James and Tom Wilkinson.

Synopsis

When a boy’s father goes to fight in World War II, he tries to will an immediate end to the war so his father will return – but will he be disappointed if his efforts fail?

Story

In the mid-1940’s, eight-year-old Pepper Busbee (Jakob Salvati) is doing his best to grow up in his small California town while World War II rages on overseas – the only problem is, his body isn’t complying.  Pepper is smaller than most of the kids around his age and as a result, he’s mercilessly teased and bullied.  Among the names he’s called, Little Boy is arguably the least objectionable.  Since Pepper doesn’t have many friends, he manages to form an unusual bond with his father James (Michael Rapaport) who winds up being more like his buddy than his parent. 

London (David Henrie), Pepper’s older brother, has reached draft age and is eager to do his duty during wartime – unfortunately, his flat feet cause him to be classified as 4F and he must remain at home with his family.  With London disqualified for service, James winds up joining the army and is sent to The Philippines.  Shamed by his rejection, London soon drowns his sorrows in alcohol as he tries to continue his father’s business as a car mechanic while his mother Emma (Watson) takes care of the family.  Emma, meanwhile, must fight off the romantic advances of the family physician, Dr. Fox (James).

Everyone’s worst fears are realized when the military notifies Emma that James is Missing In Action; they can’t be sure if he’s dead because they haven’t found a body, so it’s possible he may be in a Japanese Prisoner Of War camp.  Missing his father, Pepper is advised by the local priest (Wilkinson) that if he performs a series of good deeds, God might see fit to return James to the family.  With the help of Mr. Hashimoto (Cary-Hiroyuki Tagawa) – a local Japanese-American who suffers the bigotry that arose from the war – Pepper is able to easily strike items off the list.  But with the end of the war imminent and no word about his father, will Pepper find that his faith has been misplaced or will his prayers be answered?

Review

With a title as uninspired as “Little Boy”, the filmmakers are certainly setting an audience’s expectations at a fairly low level – and they do not disappoint.  “Little Boy” is unapologetically manipulative and cloying in its attempts to justify Christian-based faith as the one true way in a bit of propaganda that could’ve just as easily been used during the era in which this movie was set.   What remains something of a quandary is how this screenplay managed to attract the recognizable names that it did; this arouses the suspicion that this might have been done as a way of repaying a favor to some of the producers. 

“Little Boy” is so utterly repugnant, it’s hard to believe it’s getting a release in theaters; this would’ve seemed certain to be destined as one of those straight-to-video movies.  Marketers might feel that this could be one of those family-friendly films that might find enough of an audience in the heartland that it will develop a cult following throughout the Bible Belt.  There is so much off the mark in its attempts to be profound and earnest as it tries to repudiate the same prejudices it inadvertently espouses in its own awkward way.  Shaking your head and pondering what they were thinking is ultimately the only response to this motion picture.

Unabashed as the filmmakers are in their attempts to get the audience to both like and help promote the movie, there was a short that was shown prior to the screening; it featured the film’s producers explaining to the audience why it should like “Little Boy” and that it was everyone’s duty to spread the word about how this motion picture is just so utterly wonderful.  As if this effort alone wasn’t sufficiently off-putting, they had to ensure they were starting on the wrong foot with the audience by sealing their fate with such obnoxious and desperate begging and pleading.   

 

Little Boy (2015) on IMDb

Saturday, April 18, 2015

“The Wannabe”– Movie Review

 

Wannabe

This weekend at the Tribeca Film Festival, I screened the World Premiere of the new drama “The Wannabe”, starring Vincent Piazza and Patricia Arquette. 

Synopsis

When an aspiring mobster tries to become a member of John Gotti’s gang, he gets rebuffed – but can he prove his worth by making a name for himself in a life of crime?

Story

In 1992 New York City, Tommy (Piazza) is obsessed with the ongoing trial of noted mobster John Gotti – not only does he post newspaper clippings on the wall of his modest Bronx apartment, but he also attends the trial on a daily basis, observing in the courtroom and cheering on his hero.  In fact, Tommy even crashes the homecoming party for Gotti in the mob boss’s Queens neighborhood.  Although not entirely welcome as something of an outsider, it presents an opportunity for Tommy – he meets a local woman named Rose (Arquette), and the two are immediately attracted to each other. 

Tommy confesses to Rose that he desires to be in the crime world with his hero; he has even memorized lines of dialog from famous movies about the underworld.  Unfortunately for Tommy, he’s small-time; he’s been to jail for robbing a video store and is currently on parole and unemployed.  Also, his family has no connections; his older brother (Michael Imperioli) is a Bronx florist and doesn’t even remotely share Tommy’s interests.  Rose, however, has her own dark side; with a history of serious drug abuse, the idea of having a boyfriend who’s a criminal appeals to her. 

When Tommy tries to make his way into Gotti’s group, they make it clear to him that they don’t think he has what it takes to be one of them.  Rejected, Tommy and Rose set out for their own adventures, even going to the extent of holding up known mobsters in their own hangouts while she drives the getaway car.  With increasing success, their money affords them luxuries that include drug abuse, which only fuels more stick-up jobs.  Eventually, Tommy becomes upset with Curtis Sliwa (Daniel Sauli), leader of The Guardian Angels, who has his own local radio show; Sliwa uses the show to be highly critical of Gotti during the trial.  Teaming with Rose, Tommy plans to take out Sliwa – but the job is botched and Sliwa, although shot, is not seriously injured and manages to survive the attempted hit.  But with mobsters upset at Tommy’s actions, can both he and Rose avoid their revenge?

Review

Piazza and Arquette completely knock it out of the park in their respective role as Tommy and Rose.  The two are perfectly matched and truly become their character.  Together, they are a joy to watch in this gritty, pre-Giuliani New York City drama about two lost souls who found each other, albeit for a short time only.  They are able to successfully access the nuances of these two comedic-tragic lovers desperately in search of direction and meaning in life.  While they both pursue a lifestyle that is neither enviable nor admirable, the audience can empathize with them as underdogs. 

“The Wannabe” is written and directed by Nick Sandow, who did a fine job shooting the scenes where the couple are in a drug-induced haze, as well as a Scorsese-influenced overhead shot in the last scene of the movie.  Unfortunately, due to the fact that it’s a small, independent low-budget film, some scenes do tend to have a cheap feel to them.  The screenplay has a distinct air of reality about it, interspersing actual television news footage from the time.  He seems to have a genuine understanding of who these characters are and how they speak.  One troublesome point, however, is some business about possible juror tampering that tends to get a bit murky. 

Following the screening, some of the filmmakers took questions from the audience.  Sandow said that while he did some research on the characters, he wanted to dramatize the story a bit more, so he did not adhere to all of the details; he said that he found about a half a dozen pieces of information about the characters which he used for the basis of his screenplay – other than that, the rest of the story was a fictional depiction.  Piazza said that his involvement in “The Wannabe” came about as a result of a series of coincidences; he had agreed to participate in a reading of an earlier draft of the script and later, ran into Sandow while shooting an episode of “Boardwalk Empire”.  Once he informed Sandow of his interest in playing this Rupert Pupkin-style pseudo-mobster, Piazza then passed the script along to his boss, Martin Scorsese, who became one of the film’s executive producers. 

The Wannabe (2015) on IMDb

“Bleeding Heart”–Movie Review

 

Bleeding_Heart

During the first weekend of The Tribeca Film Festival, I attended the World Premiere of the new drama “Bleeding Heart” starring Jessica Biel and Zosia Mamet.

Synopsis

When a woman finds a girl she believes may be her biological sister, they become acquainted – but when she learns the girl’s abusive boyfriend is also her pimp, can she be saved?

Story

Working as a yoga instructor in Los Angeles, May (Biel) is something of an anachronism – a spiritual type, others’ observations characterize her as something of a hippy.   Living with her boyfriend and business partner Dex (Edi Gathegi), they are trying to expand their yoga business.  Adopted as a child, May knows she has a biological half-sister somewhere out in the world and becomes committed to finding her.  Eventually, she locates Shiva (Mamet), a young lady living with her boyfriend Cody (Joe Anderson) in a cheap apartment complex in town. 

Reluctantly, Shiva agrees to meet with May, who manages to convince her that they are indeed related.  After a while, their guard drops and the two seem to hit it off as they both start to actually believe they are sisters.  As May gets to know Shiva, she comes to find out that Shiva’s career isn’t going quite as well as May’s; with Shiva encountering difficulty paying rent from month to month, May lends her some money.  Later, she learns that Shiva has been lying – instead of employment a “massage therapist”, she’s really a prostitute and Cody is the one who secures her johns. 

Ultimately, May discovers Cody is being both physically and emotionally abusive to Shiva and offers her a place to stay – much to the consternation of Dex.  When Cody arranges an appointment for Shiva, May decides she is the only one who can intervene.  Rescuing Shiva, May goes to her adoptive mother’s house, bringing Shiva with her.  Understandably, her mother is angry about this intrusion and doesn’t exactly make Shiva feel particularly welcome.  However, Cody becomes aware of Shiva’s whereabouts and shows up at the mother’s house to retrieve both his girlfriend and meal ticket.  But when Cody confronts the interfering May, will she be able to rescue Shiva once again or will both women be endangered by Cody? 

Review

Here’s a question for you:  If the protagonist in your movie behaves foolishly and makes irrational decisions, are they truly heroic characters?  And can an audience truly root for such a person?  Well, perhaps if the film in question is a comedy, a filmmaker might be able to get away with such a choice (e.g., “Dumb And Dumber”?).  But can it be carried off in a drama?  A viewing of “Bleeding Heart” may be able to answer that question for you.  The answer will be a resounding no, she is neither heroic nor can an audience make much of an emotional investment in her. 

While it’s certainly refreshing to see Mamet in a role so drastically different (and darker) than the goofy chick she plays on HBO’s “Girls”, neither her performance nor that of Biel can manage to elevate the weak material in “Bleeding Heart”.  This movie evolves into an updated version of “Thelma And Louise”, replete with the full complement of male-phobic screed.   “Bleeding Heart” is a female buddy film with female buddies that not only aren’t easily relatable but also not women you’d want to have as friends (much less see them as each other’s friends). 

Following the screening, there was a question and answer session with “Bleeding Heart”’s writer/director Diane Bell.  Bell said that the idea for the story came out of her own background as a yoga instructor; she eventually wound up teaching in Spain, where she came into contact with a number of prostitutes.  She said that these women were unhappy and not necessarily in their profession voluntarily.  In the original version of the screenplay, the two women were not sisters; according to Bell, one of the producers, who was adopted, suggested the idea that perhaps they were sisters – the idea took hold and remained in the script. 

Bleeding Heart (2015) on IMDb

Thursday, April 16, 2015

“True Story”– Movie Review

 

TrueStory

This week, I attended a New York Times Film Club screening of the new drama, “True Story”, starring Jonah Hill, James Franco and Felicity Jones.

Synopsis

When a disgraced journalist learns an accused murderer is using his name, he authors a book about the experience – but will he inadvertently wind up helping to set free a dangerous killer?

Story

As a reporter for The New York Times, Michael Finkel (Hill) has contributed many important stories for the newspaper.  After writing a piece about slavery in Africa, some of his research is called into question; an embarrassed New York Times is forced to print a correction and as a result, Finkel is fired. With his reputation now in tatters, Finkel moves back to Montana with his wife Jill (Jones) and tries unsuccessfully to sell freelance pieces to various publications. During this period, he is contacted by a local journalist who informs him accused murderer Christian Longo (Franco) has been posing as Finkel. Stunned, Finkel heads to the Oregon prison where Longo is being held to meet with him.

In their meeting, Longo admits to a degree of hero worship for Finkel; having spent much of his life secretly wanting to be a writer of Finkel’s quality, he claims to have used Finkel’s name in order to protect his true identity – but he chose Finkel specifically because that’s who he truly wished he was. Seduced by the depth of Longo’s admiration, Finkel finds himself befriending Longo; he tries to ascertain Longo’s guilt and if so, what his reason was for killing his wife and all three children. Longo sends Finkel a lengthy handwritten letter detailing no only his background, but his relationship with his family. Suspecting the possibility of a book which could repair his reputation, Finkel successfully pitches the idea to a publisher.

Proceeding with a draft, the publisher promises Finkel a substantial advance, but Longo is assured that he will not see any financial gain from either its publication or sale. As Longo’s trial begins, however, Finkel is starting to suspect that Longo has played him like a violin. Seeing he has been manipulated, Finkel brings a draft of his book to the prosecution in the hope that it can be used to ensure a guilty verdict for Longo; they decline his offer, citing his relatively recent reputation for lack of honesty and accuracy in his reporting. Taking the stand on his own behalf, Longo gives a rather bizarre and fantastic but nevertheless sincere testimony, insisting that it was his wife who killed the children. But will this help to set Longo free or will he be found guilty of all the murders?

Review

“True Story” is a complicated and intriguing multi-layered story of redemption and deception – deception of others as well as the delusion of self-deception. As the characters reveal themselves, it seems Longo and Finkel get caught up not only in the lies they tell others but also the lies they tell themselves. The main reason to see this movie is because of the performances by Hill and Franco; it could be argued that while Finkel is seeking redemption through his book about Longo, Franco might just as easily be seeking redemption (possibly for the recent controversy of the ho-hum “The Interview”).

The film itself is a slightly different matter. What’s problematic is the manner in which its story is told – or perhaps more to the point, the omission of certain information, which is rather frustrating. While there may be movies that run on longer than necessary, the odd thing about “True Story” is that it’s too short – for a tale that’s so character-focused, it’s a little thin when it comes to background or motivations for either character. True, Finkel is in need of redemption – but why use Longo since it only reinforces the suspicion of Finkel’s narcissism? Why did Longo kill his family? Allusions are made to possible financial difficulties, but it’s so vague, it suggests that since the movie is based on Finkel’s book, once again his research is flawed.

A quirky aspect to “True Story” – but something that is consistent with real life – is the fact that neither of the main characters is a true protagonist; there is very little that could be considered heroic about Finkel and absolutely nothing heroic about Longo. While Finkel may not be as evil as Longo, neither is he the most sympathetic character – if anyone, an audience’s sympathies would most likely go to Jill. In the end, did Finkel acquire the redemption he so desperately sought? Well, HarperCollins published his book and Hollywood purchased the rights to said book in order to produce a major motion picture based on its story. Draw your own conclusion. 

 

True Story (2015) on IMDb

Wednesday, April 15, 2015

“The Water Diviner”– Movie Review

 

waterdiv

This week, I attended a New York Times Film Club screening of the drama “The Water Diviner”, starring Russell Crowe, who also directed.

Synopsis

When a man believes he’s lost his three sons to a war, he heads overseas to try to locate them – but will he find them alive or have they all perished?

Story

A century ago, The Battle Of Gallipoli took place in Turkey; The ANZACs (the Australian and New Zealand Army Corps) spent months fighting the Turkish military before eventually retreating, thus ceding victory to the Turks. Both sides incurred substantial losses, but there may be no Australian family that suffered more than The Connors; Connor (Crowe) and his wife surrendered all three of their sons to the war and none of them returned. Years after the war’s end, Connor’s wife is still so traumatized by the loss of her children that she commits suicide. Now a widower, this becomes Connor’s motivation to venture to Turkey; his mission is to either find his sons and bring them home or secure their remains and give them a proper burial back in Australia.

Once in Istanbul, Connor sees he will not easily accomplish his goal. For one thing, the British military refuse to provide him with the necessary pass to reach Gallipoli. Another problem is resistance from the Turkish people themselves; although several years removed from the war, memories of hatred for the Aussies remains rather fresh. Stuck, Connor takes a room at a hotel run by Ayshe (Olga Kurylenko); Ayshe is openly hostile to Connor when when discovering he’s Australian – her husband was killed in the war and she’s now forced to raise her young son Orhan (Dylan Georgiades) alone.

Eventually, Connor finds a way to circumvent the British military’s regulations and reaches Gallipoli – much to the consternation of the Australian military officer there. It seems the Australian military are also struggling to recover the remains of their fallen and have been forced to enlist the aid of their Turkish counterparts in order to do so. After believing he may have uncovered some identification belonging to two of his sons, Connor learns his oldest son may have survived at a Prisoner Of War camp. With this information, Connor begins a dangerous trek across Turkey, which now finds itself engaged in a war with Greece. Upon arriving at the location where his son is believed to be living, will Connor be able to find him and convince him to return to Australia? 

Review

“The Water Diviner” is based on a true story; released in Australia, it won several awards. This may have come out of a sense of patriotism – in some respects, it feels like their version of “American Sniper”. The dour tone of the story put into place at the movie’s opening tries to be somewhat offset by the suggestion of Connor’s romance with Ayshe and his paternalistic friendship with Orhan. As far as the action scenes are concerned, Connor is portrayed as something of an Australian version of Indiana Jones. These unrealistic representations tend to undercut what is, at its essence, an otherwise remarkable tale of fatherly devotion.

Viewers both willing and able to substantially suspend disbelief during this highly sensationalized version of these events may find “The Water Diviner” to be an entertaining adventure. Unless the story is thoroughly researched before viewing the movie, it will be difficult to separate reality from fiction – and therein lies part of the problem with “The Water Diviner”. There is a title card at the beginning of the film which states upfront this is based on a true story, but which parts are actually true and the rest the product of the imagination of the picture’s screenwriters is just about anyone’s guess.

There is also the matter of Crowe’s ego that appears to be imbued in nearly every shot; he seems to be dedicated to branding himself as the aging action-adventure hero type in the style of Liam Neeson. Crowe’s directorial choices are curious.  For example, why is the audience treated to seemingly random shots of whirling dervishes at various points? Without giving away much, the ending is a little too perfect; all of the characters’ stories are tidily resolved and while this may be fitting in a work of fiction, seeing it in a movie supposedly having its basis in fact may be a bit hard to take.

The Water Diviner (2014) on IMDb