Recently, I attended a screening at Lincoln Center for the new French drama directed by Catherine Breillat “Last Summer”.
Synopsis
When a woman has an affair with her husband’s teenage son
from a previous marriage, what impact will this have on everyone’s
relationship?
Story
Anne and Pierre (Léa Drucker, Olivier Rabourdin) appear to
be happily married; she’s a successful lawyer and he’s an overworked
businessman. She did not have children
previously, so together, they have adopted a couple of little girls. He was married before and had a son, Theo
(Samuel Kircher), who is now a very troubled 17 year old recently expelled from
school. Anne gives Pierre permission to
invite the boy into their home with the hope that he can somehow manage to
straighten him out once and for all.
This is a decision Anne soon comes to regret for many reasons.
Almost immediately after Theo arrives, trouble commences. He begins ransacking the house, making it
look like burglars have broken in and some things turn up missing. Basically, Anne and Pierre’s life turns topsy
turvy. Because Pierre is so busy with
work, it winds up that Anne has to deal with most of the problems. With Pierre totally distracted by his
business, Anne welcomes the attention his son offers. Soon, with Pierre away, Anne and Theo begin
to have an affair. Neither one of them
tells Pierre, but eventually, some of Anne’s friends learn of it and ostracize
her immediately.
Eventually, Pierre and Theo agree to a weekend father and
son getaway so that Pierre can at least try to bond with his son. It is here that Theo confesses to his father
that he has been enjoying various trysts with Anne while Pierre has been sidetracked. Upon their return, Pierre confronts Anne
about this, which she denies. She soon
learns that the relationship means more to Theo than it did to her. When Theo contacts a lawyer about this
relationship, it threatens Anne’s career because he is underage. Will this dalliance cause Anne to lose both
her profession and her marriage to Pierre?
Based on a Danish film from 2019, Breillat’s style brilliantly poses questions about the frailty of human morals. It asks the question, “Why do we always seem to want something we either know we can’t have or at least shouldn’t have?”. As an experienced family lawyer, Léa Drucker’s character has seen many cases of domestic abuse of varying types. In short, she should know better. Yet she doesn’t. When faced with temptation, she immediately gives in without seeming to display an ounce of resistance. Her world with her adopted daughters and successful, loving husband seem too perfect and the urge to self-destruct is far too strong.
It should be kept in mind that she is neither a victim nor
an instigator; she is merely a participant in an act that she knows will risk a
great deal for her – both professionally and personally – if it is
uncovered. Yet she makes the decision –
apparently a not too difficult one – to cast aside those concerns in favor of
her immediate pleasure. One unintended
consequence of this is the impact this affair has on Samuel Kircher’s Théo; he
takes it to heart far too much when it was thought this would just be another
sexual conquest by a lustful teenager who seems capable of getting much younger
and attractive women closer to his own age.
In previous interviews, Breillat has said that she hasn’t seen the original film on which hers is based. It was presented to her by the screenwriter who wanted a French remake and offered it to her because she could make it better. She said that while some of her film is verbatim from the original, one difference from the Danish version is that Breillat didn’t want the woman to have a predatorial dynamic and wanted the teen to be more involved. Although they didn’t really improvise on set they did find different kinds of nuances while shooting. The ending found in the script was different from the way it was finally shot, as they did two endings.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Speak Your Piece, Beeyotch!